Maximum motion displacement (Dmax) is the largest dot displacement in a random-dot kinematogram (RDK) at which direction of motion can be correctly discriminated [Braddick, O. (1974). A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research, 14, 519-527]. For first-order RDKs, Dmax gets larger as dot size increases and/or dot density decreases. It has been suggested that this increase in Dmax reflects greater involvement of high-level feature-matching motion mechanisms and less dependence on low-level motion detectors [Sato, T. (1998). Dmax: Relations to low- and high-level motion processes. In T. Watanabe (Ed.), High-level motion processing, computational, neurobiological, and psychophysical perspectives (pp. 115-151). Boston: MIT Press]. Recent psychophysical findings [Ho, C. S., & Giaschi, D. E. (2006). Deficient maximum motion displacement in amblyopia. Vision Research, 46, 4595-4603; Ho, C. S., & Giaschi, D. E. (2007). Stereopsis-dependent deficits in maximum motion displacement. Vision Research, 47, 2778-2785] suggest that this "switch" from low-level to high-level motion processing is also observed in children with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia as RDK dot size is increased and/or dot density is decreased. However, both high- and low-level Dmax were reduced relative to controls. In this study, we used functional MRI to determine the motion-sensitive areas that may account for the reduced Dmax in amblyopia In the control group, low-level RDKs elicited stronger responses in low-level (posterior occipital) areas and high-level RDKs elicited a greater response in high-level (extra-striate occipital-parietal) areas when activation for high-level RDKs was compared to that for low-level RDKs. Participants with anisometropic amblyopia showed the same pattern of cortical activation although extent of activation differences was less than in controls. For those with strabismic amblyopia, there was almost no difference in the cortical activity for low-level and high-level RDKs, and activation was reduced relative to the other groups. Differences in the extent of cortical activation may be related to amblyogenic subtype.