Comparing isotropic and anisotropic smoothing for voxel-based DTI analyses: A simulation study

Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Jan;31(1):98-114. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20848.

Abstract

Voxel-based analysis (VBA) methods are increasingly being used to compare diffusion tensor image (DTI) properties across different populations of subjects. Although VBA has many advantages, its results are highly dependent on several parameter settings, such as those from the coregistration technique applied to align the data, the smoothing kernel, the statistics, and the post-hoc analyses. In particular, to increase the signal-to-noise ratio and to mitigate the adverse effect of residual image misalignments, DTI data are often smoothed before VBA with an isotropic Gaussian kernel with a full width half maximum up to 16 x 16 x 16 mm(3). However, using isotropic smoothing kernels can significantly partial volume or voxel averaging artifacts, adversely affecting the true diffusion properties of the underlying fiber tissue. In this work, we compared VBA results between the isotropic and an anisotropic Gaussian filtering method using a simulated framework. Our results clearly demonstrate an increased sensitivity and specificity of detecting a predefined simulated pathology when the anisotropic smoothing kernel was used.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Anisotropy
  • Artifacts
  • Brain / anatomy & histology
  • Brain / physiology
  • Brain Mapping / methods*
  • Computer Simulation*
  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging / methods*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Nerve Fibers, Myelinated / physiology
  • Nerve Fibers, Myelinated / ultrastructure
  • Normal Distribution
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity