[A difficult diagnosis]

Bull Cancer. 2009 Jul-Aug;96(7):785-9. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2009.0911.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The patient information and obtaining their consent before any therapeutic constitute a basis for medicine exercise. However, there are situations where the physician may be in default. In that case, concepts of benefit/risk balance, of clear and appropriate information, and of legal liability for medico-surgical staff takes all their magnitude. That was the case in our observation, with a 69 years old patient with history of smoking, presenting a suspicious lung opacity which will require, following an agreement by multidisciplinary meeting, an exploration by thoracotomy despite an acceptable but altered respiratory function, as a result of a post-smoking broncho-emphysema. The non-malignant character of the suspected lesion raise questions about the risks involved, the benefit/risk balance, and the legal risk scopes of the medicosurgical staff as defined in the Cancer programme framework.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Chronic Disease
  • Clinical Protocols
  • France
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Liability, Legal
  • Lung Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Lung Diseases / surgery
  • Lung Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Male
  • Patient Care Team / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Patient Care Team / organization & administration
  • Patient Compliance*
  • Patient Education as Topic / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Risk
  • Thoracotomy* / adverse effects