Selection of live-related liver transplantation candidates

J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jun;44(6):1096-100; discussion 1100-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.012.

Abstract

Purpose: Living donor liver transplantation (LR) is an important alternative for children. We compared our outcomes of LR and cadaveric (CAD) graft recipients, with attention to the pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score and perioperative morbidity and mortality to identify appropriate candidates for LR.

Methods: Our transplant database and electronic medical records were searched for demographics and outcome measures.

Results: From 2000 to 2008, 81 children underwent liver transplantation from 37 LR and 44 CAD donors. There were no significant differences in graft or overall survival at 3 months or 1 year. The LR group was significantly younger (4.46 +/- 5.2 years vs 7.41 +/- 6.6 years; P = .03) and had a significantly lower PELD score (12.7 +/- 13 vs 22 +/- 12; P = .001) at the time of transplantation. Ten patients were transplanted for unresectable tumor in the LR group vs 4 CAD (P = .03). Significantly fewer LR recipients required return to the operating room in the first 30 days posttransplant (13.9% vs 34.1%; P = .03). The LR recipients had a higher rate of biliary stricture requiring reoperation (22.2% vs 2.3%; P = .005).

Conclusions: The LR liver transplantation is highly selected for patients with a parent donor who will need transplant but do not yet have a high PELD score. A lower PELD score at operation may have contributed to the lower incidence of postoperative complications requiring reoperation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Graft Survival
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Liver Failure / surgery*
  • Liver Transplantation*
  • Living Donors*
  • Patient Selection*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome