Sc(3)RuC(4) and Sc(3)OsC(4) were synthesized by arc-melting and subsequent annealing. At room temperature, they crystallize with the Sc(3)CoC(4) structure, space group Immm. At 223 and 255 K, Sc(3)RuC(4) and Sc(3)OsC(4), respectively, show a monoclinic distortion caused by a pair-wise displacement of the one-dimensional [Ru(C(2))(2)](delta-) and [Os(C(2))(2)](delta-) polyanions, which are embedded in a scandium matrix. Superstructure formation leads to shorter Ru-Ru and Os-Os distances of 316 pm between adjacent [Ru(C(2))(2)](delta-) and [Os(C(2))(2)](delta-) polyanions. Each ruthenium (osmium) atom is covalently bonded to four C(2) pairs with Ru-C (Os-C) distances of 220-222 pm. A comparison of the C-C bond distances at room temperature in Sc(3)TC(4) with T representing a group 8 transition metal (Fe, Ru, Os) reveals a minimum in the case of the 4d metal Ru: 144.98(11) pm (Fe), 142.8(7) pm (Ru), and 144.6(4) pm (Os). Analysis of the local electronic structure of the [T(C(2))(2)] moieties hints at a complex interplay between chemical bonding and relativistic effects, which is responsible for the V-shaped pattern of the C-C bond distances (long, short, and long for T = Fe, Ru, and Os, respectively). Relativistic effects lead to a strengthening of covalent T-C bonding. This is shown on the basis of periodic DFT calculations by a significant increase of the charge density at the T-C bond critical points (0.55 < 0.57 < 0.64 eA(-3)) down the row of group 8 elements. These structural characteristics and topological features do not change in the corresponding low-temperature phases of Sc(3)RuC(4) and Sc(3)OsC(4). However, topological analyses of theoretical charge density distributions reveal distinct changes of the valence shell charge concentrations at the transition metal centers due to the monoclinic distortions. Presumably, the local electronic situation at the transition metals reflects the origin and extent of these monoclinic distortions.