Objective: To explore the indications and key points of anterolateral minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty.
Methods: 110 baseline indexes matched patients admitted for unilateral total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups to undergo surgery through a short anterolateral incision of < or = 10 cm or a standard posterolateral incision. All operations were done by the same surgeon. The demographic data, perioperative indexes, and postoperative function indexes were recorded and statistically analyzed.
Results: No significant differences were detected with respect to operation time, abduction angle, anteversion angle, stem alignment, and stem fixation between these 2 groups. The incision length, blood loss, perioperative transfusion, and 100 - mm visual analogue pain scale (VAS) score at the first 24 hours of the anterolateral approach group were (7.49 +/- 0.86) cm, (376.18 +/- 168.30) ml, (410.09 +/- 136.46) ml, and (30.76 +/- 21.77) respectively, all significantly shorter, less, or lower than those of the standard posterolateral approach group [(15.2 +/- 1.8) cm, (605.0 +/- 225.1) ml, (629.5 +/- 232.9) ml, and (50.3 +/- 13.7) respectively, all P < 0.01]. The Harris hip score and Barthel index 3 months after operation of the anterolateral approach group were (83.80 +/- 5.64) and (93.45 +/- 6.37) respectively, both significantly higher than those of the standard posterolateral approach group [(75.0 +/- 7.5) and (94.6 +/- 7.5) respectively, both P < 0.01)], however, there were not significant differences in the Harris hip score and Barthel index 3 years after operation between these 2 groups.
Conclusions: Fewer traumas, less blood loss and rapid recovery can be obtained through this new total hip arthroplasty approach. But experienced doctors and special instruments are prerequisite.