Minimal residual disease may help to establish clinical decisions in patients with AML. WT1 offers the possibility to analyze those cases without currently known underlying genetic abnormalities. To compare the value of chimeric specific quantitative PCR with WT1 PCR in CBF acute leukemia, 445 samples from 96 AML (49 AML1-ETO+ and 47 CBFB-MYH11+) cases were included in the study. For each sample AML1-ETO or CBFB-MYH11 levels obtained using the conditions of the BIOMED group were compared with the results of WT1 levels using sensitive primers and conditions. Simultaneously, normal range expression of WT1 was established using RNA obtained from eight healthy donors. WT1 mutations were also investigated both at RNA and at the genomic level. The majority of CBF samples showed rises in WT1 levels (88.7%) at diagnosis. However, 18% of AML1-ETO showed WT1 levels below 250 copies in contrast with 5% CBFB-MYH11 cases. WT1 mutation was not detected in any case (70 diagnostic samples). We found correlation between WT1 levels at diagnosis and the CD34 blast population estimated by flow cytometry in CBFB-MYH11+ cases. We found no association between WT1 levels and clinical outcome. There was a high concordance between chimeric transcript analysis and WT1 levels in CR patients. Concordance was also high in relapsed patients (78% in AML1-ETO and 98% in CBFB-MYH11+ cases). Both WT1 and specific chimeric transcript identified and rescued false negative results of the other test. Additional studies are needed to determine whether the rare discrepancies are a reflection of the cooperative nature of WT1 overexpression or a consequence of the uneven distribution in the leukemic population. WT1 is a powerful MRD tool even in cases with currently available molecular targets.