Mammotome versus ATEC: a comparison of two breast vacuum biopsy techniques under sonographic guidance

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Feb;281(2):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1101-5. Epub 2009 Apr 30.

Abstract

Purpose: The study evaluates the differences between the Mammotome (MT) and ATEC (A) vacuum biopsy (VB) of the breast in terms of diagnostic reliability, biopsy duration and complications.

Methods: In a prospective randomized study, 62 ultrasound-guided VBs of the breast were performed. MT and A were compared using Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The mean lesion size and the BI-RADS distribution were equal in both groups. Representative tissue was extracted in all 62 biopsies; thus no repeat biopsies were necessary. A sonographically guided complete excision was possible in 46 cases. More imaging-guided complete excisions were achieved with the MT than with A (87 vs. 63%). Technical complications occurred twice with A and once with MT. No medical complications occurred in either group.

Conclusions: Both systems are suitable for the diagnostic clarification of unclear breast lesions as well as complete excision of benign lesions under sonographic imaging. Sonographically guided complete resection was achieved more often with the MT.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biopsy, Needle / methods*
  • Biopsy, Needle / standards
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional / methods
  • Young Adult