Evaluation of point-of-care activated partial thromboplastin time testing by comparison to laboratory-based assay for control of intravenous heparin

Angiology. 2009 Jun-Jul;60(3):358-61. doi: 10.1177/0003319709332958. Epub 2009 Apr 26.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients on intravenous heparin require regular activated partial thromboplastin time monitoring. Laboratory-based activated partial thromboplastin time assays necessitate a delay between blood sampling and dose adjustment. Point-of-care testing could permit immediate dose adjustments, potentially enabling tighter control of anticoagulation.

Aim: To assess equivalence of activated partial thromboplastin time measured by conventional laboratory assay and by a novel proprietary point-of-care testing system (Hemochron Response, ITC, Thoratec Corporation, Edison, NJ) among surgical ward patients on intravenous heparin.

Methods: A total of 39 blood samples from patients on intravenous heparin were tested with both laboratory and point-of-care assays. Assay equivalence was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Results. Point-of-care measurements exceeded laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time by a mean of 15 seconds (standard deviation 19). In 19 cases (49%), the point-of-care measurement would have resulted in different heparin dosing from the laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time.

Conclusions: The Hemochron Response system is not sufficiently accurate for routine ward use compared with laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time assays.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / standards*
  • Heparin / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Partial Thromboplastin Time / standards*
  • Point-of-Care Systems / standards*
  • Postoperative Complications / blood
  • Postoperative Complications / drug therapy
  • Reference Standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surgery Department, Hospital
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures

Substances

  • Heparin