Elective inguinal hernia repair: a unified informed consent, or who wants to know what?

Am Surg. 2009 Apr;75(4):296-300.

Abstract

Informed consent is increasingly being standardized. We sought to evaluate variability in the amount and quality of information desired by patients in choosing whether to undergo elective surgical hernia repair, a prototypical low- to moderate-risk common procedure. Consecutive stable outpatients were asked to assume that they were considering hernia repair and interviewed with a standard questionnaire that asked them to rate their interest in learning about the natural history, pathology, and management of inguinal hernia as well as herniorrhaphy complications and postoperative recovery. Ninety-eight consecutive patients exhibited substantial interpersonal variability in their level of interest in receiving information. Although interest in some types of information tended to correlate with interest in other types of information, patients' degree of interest in receiving information about anesthesia during the procedure was independent of other variables. Education and previous exposure to individuals with hernias also affected interest in receiving potentially important information before deciding whether to consent to hernia surgery. Patients may vary with regard to the information they want to receive when deciding whether to consent to an invasive procedure. It may be preferable to individualize the consent process to patients' preferences rather than adhering to standardized content.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Decision Making*
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / psychology*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hernia, Inguinal / psychology
  • Hernia, Inguinal / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent / standards*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Education as Topic / methods*
  • Physician-Patient Relations / ethics*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires