A critical appraisal of open- and closed-chest models of experimental myocardial ischemia

Lab Anim (NY). 2009 May;38(5):167-77. doi: 10.1038/laban0509-167.

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia is one of the most extensively studied topics in modern cardiovascular research. Early investigators first reported experimental myocardial ischemia (EMI) in 1862. The open-chest (surgical) approach is a well-developed model of EMI that enables researchers to directly access and observe the heart. With this approach, EMI is generally induced by surgical ligation of a coronary artery. A drawback of the open-chest model is the need for major surgery, which can result in local and systemic side effects. Alternative closed-chest models of EMI have been developed; most of these models involve endovascular catheterization with coronary artery embolization or thrombosis. Closed-chest techniques eliminate the need for invasive surgery, and the resultant model is more physiologically similar to clinical myocardial ischemia than is EMI produced by artery ligation. The authors present a review of open- and closed-chest models of EMI and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Laboratory
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Coronary Vessels / surgery
  • Disease Models, Animal*
  • Embolism
  • Ligation
  • Microspheres
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Myocardial Ischemia / etiology*
  • Myocardial Ischemia / pathology
  • Myocardial Ischemia / physiopathology
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Thoracic Surgical Procedures / methods*