Purpose: Outcomes for patients developing a leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis have not been well investigated. This study explored whether the use of a stapled or handsewn anastomosis was associated with different outcomes when an anastomotic leak developed.
Patients and methods: Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained pouch database. Functional outcomes regarding bowel movements, urgency, continence, and seepage were evaluated. Quality of life was assessed by the Cleveland Global Quality of Life Score.
Results: One hundred and seventy-five patients with anastomotic leak (141 stapled and 34 handsewn anastomosis) were identified. The two groups were similar in gender and diagnosis. Patients with handsewn anastomosis were younger (P = 0.04), had less perioperative steroid use (P = 0.05), more proximal diversion (P = 0.02), and S-pouch creation (P = 0.003). More handsewn cases had intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.04) and postoperative hemorrhage within the pelvis (P = 0.003). Long-term pouch failure was 35.3 percent in the handsewn group and 12 percent in the stapled group (P = 0.002), which was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rank P = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, leak after handsewn anastomosis was independently associated with pouch failure. Leak after stapled anastomosis carried a lower incontinence rate at 5 years (P = 0.03), while handsewn had higher nocturnal seepage rate at 3, 5, and 10 years, and most recent follow-up. Cleveland Global Quality of Life Score was comparable between the groups during follow-up.
Conclusion: Outcomes including functional results and pouch failure rates for patients developing a leak after stapled anastomosis at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were significantly better than outcomes for patients who develop a leak after handsewn anastomosis.