A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis

Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 May;69(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.061. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic therapy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) via direct intracavitary debridement is described.

Objective: To compare direct endoscopic necrosectomy with conventional transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of WOPN.

Design: Retrospective, comparative study.

Setting: Academic tertiary-care center.

Patients: Patients referred to Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, since April 1998 for endoscopic drainage of WOPN.

Interventions: Each patient underwent standard endoscopic drainage that consisted of transmural cavity puncture, dilation of the fistula tract, and placement of a large-bore stent(s). Patients were classified into the direct endoscopic necrosectomy group if, during any of their procedures, adjunctive direct endoscopic necrosectomy was performed; all others were in the standard drainage group.

Main outcome measurements: Success was defined as resolution of the necrotic cavity without the need for operative or percutaneous intervention.

Results: Forty-five patients were identified who met study criteria: 25 underwent direct endoscopic necrosectomy, and 20 underwent standard endoscopic drainage. There were no differences in baseline patient or cavity characteristics. Successful resolution was accomplished in 88% who underwent direct endoscopic necrosectomy versus 45% who received standard drainage (P < .01), without a change in the total number of procedures. The maximum size of tract dilation was larger in the direct endoscopic necrosectomy group (17 mm vs 14 mm, P < .02). Complications were limited to mild periprocedural bleeding with equivalent rates between groups.

Limitations: Retrospective, referral bias, single center.

Conclusions: Direct endoscopic necrosectomy achieves higher rates of resolution, without a concomitant change in the number of endoscopic procedures, complication rate, or time to resolution compared with standard endoscopic drainage for WOPN. The need for fewer postprocedural inpatient hospital days and a decrease in the rate of cavity recurrence are also likely benefits of this technique.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Debridement / methods*
  • Drainage / methods*
  • Duodenoscopy / methods*
  • Endosonography
  • Female
  • Gastroscopy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreatic Cyst / surgery*
  • Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents
  • Surgical Instruments
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional