Automatic selection of optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for dual-source CT coronary angiography

Eur Radiol. 2009 Jul;19(7):1645-52. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1329-2. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a motion-map algorithm that automatically determines optimal reconstruction windows for dual-source coronary CT angiography. In datasets from 50 consecutive patients, optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows were determined using the motion-map algorithm. For manual determination of the optimal reconstruction window, datasets were reconstructed in 5% steps throughout the RR interval. Motion artifacts were rated for each major coronary vessel using a five-point scale. Mean motion scores using the motion-map algorithm were 2.4 +/- 0.8 for systolic reconstructions and 1.9 +/- 0.8 for diastolic reconstructions. Using the manual approach, overall motion scores were significantly better (1.9 +/- 0.5 and 1.7 +/- 0.6, p < 0.05), but diagnostic image quality was reached in >90% of cases using either approach. Using the automated approach, there was a negative correlation between heart rate and motion scores for systolic reconstructions (rho = -0.26, p < 0.05) and a positive correlation for diastolic reconstructions (rho = 0.46, p < 0.01). For the manual approach, no significant correlation was found for systolic reconstructions (rho = -0.1, p = 0.52), while there was a positive correlation for diastolic reconstructions (rho = 0.48, p < 0.01). Thus, the motion-map algorithm is a useful tool to save time in finding an appropriate reconstruction window in patients with heart rates <70 bpm (diastolic reconstruction) and >80 bpm (systolic reconstruction).

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms
  • Artifacts*
  • Artificial Intelligence*
  • Coronary Angiography / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / diagnostic imaging*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pattern Recognition, Automated / methods*
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
  • Young Adult