Background and aims: Prospective, long-term reports and predictors of outcome of endoscope-guided pneumatic dilation are lacking in the literature. The aim of this prospective 7-year follow-up study is to report the efficacy of endoscope-guided pneumatic dilation and determine the possible confounding factors related to remission.
Methods: Between January 1998 and June 2004, 32 patients were enrolled. Each patient was treated with endoscope-guided pneumatic dilation and followed-up at regular intervals for a median of 4.5 years. Remission was determined with the use of a structured interview and a previously described symptom score. Cumulative remission rate was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method with assessment of symptom scores between grades before and after PD at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and then every year after. Possible confounding factors related to the remissions were analyzed by Cox's proportional hazard model.
Results: Complete follow-up until August 2007 was obtained in 100% of all patients. Cumulative remissions were 1 year (86.7%), 2 years (86.7%), 3 years (80.0%), 4 years (76.5%), 5 years (72.9%), 6 years (61.7%), and 7 years (61.7%), respectively. Age is a relevant confounding factor to the remissions showing a worse outcome for those under 45 (p = 0.046). One esophageal perforation occurred (3.3%).
Conclusions: Endoscope-guided PD itself is safe and modestly effective for up to 7 years investigations in current study. Older patients (>45 years) have favorable overall clinical remissions.