Aim: This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the etiology of elevated CA 19-9 levels and to present appropriate guidelines for the asymptomatic patients.
Methods: Between January 2004 and March 2007, we enrolled consecutive asymptomatic patients who had elevated CA 19-9 levels >37 U/mL. To evaluate the etiology, the CA 19-9 level was rechecked and further studies were carried out. If the CA 19-9 level decreased to the normal range, or if it showed a decreasing trend, then it was monitored annually. Yet, if the CA 19-9 level showed an increasing trend, then the level was monitored at intervals of 1, 3, and 6 months until no evidence of malignancy was proven.
Results: Of the 62,976 patients, 501 (0.8%) subjects showed an elevated CA 19-9 level. This prospective analysis was conducted on 353 subjects (70.5%) who were followed up for at least 6 months. Ten patients (2.8%) were diagnosed with malignancies. There were 97 patients (27.5%) with benign diseases and 246 patients (69.7%) were deemed non-specific.
Conclusions: CA 19-9 should not be used as a screening tool. In the case of a persistently elevated CA 19-9 level, further work-up for determining the etiology should be done.