A survey of patient advocates within the National Cancer Institute's Prostate Cancer SPORE Program: who are they? what motivates them? what might they tell us?

J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(4):222-5. doi: 10.1080/08858190802188768.

Abstract

Background: Interacting with patients, researchers, and administrators, patient advocates have a unique vantage point. Yet, few prior studies have sought to understand these individuals or to seek their opinions on cancer issues.

Methods: A survey to address the foregoing was developed and mailed to advocates within the National Cancer Institute's Prostate Cancer SPORE Program.

Results: A total of 10 of 19 advocates responded. All were men, most were retired, and all had faced a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Two major themes emerged: (1) the importance of patient education in promoting informed clinical decision-making and (2) a perceived need for patient-centered research by providers and educators.

Conclusions: Prostate cancer patient advocates provide a broad range of opinions on the spectrum of cancer care. Similar studies among advocates involved in other malignancies may be worthwhile.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Biomedical Research / organization & administration*
  • Decision Making
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
  • Patient Advocacy*
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Pilot Projects
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States