One size fits all partnerships? What explains community partnership leadership skills?

Health Promot Pract. 2010 Jul;11(4):501-14. doi: 10.1177/1524839908318289. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

Abstract

The authors evaluated W. K. Kellogg-funded Community Partnerships (CPs) between academic, health service, and community partners in South Africa. Stakeholders (N = 668 respondents) completed questionnaires to explore the operational, functional and organisational factors that contribute to members' perceptions of the skills of their CPs' leadership. Ten factors accounted for 53% of leadership skills across five participating CPs and six stakeholder groups. Each CP displayed its unique footprint of factors that accounted for its leadership levels. Similarly, each stakeholder group had its unique signature of factors that were associated with its leadership. Two factors (communication mechanisms and operational understanding) accounted for more than 25% of leadership skills; management capabilities and participation benefits accounted for 4% and 3%; and effectiveness, benefits to difficulties ratio of being a member, engagement in education, flow of information and sense of ownership accounted for 2% to 3% each. Attention to these and other factors is warranted.

MeSH terms

  • Community Participation*
  • Community-Institutional Relations*
  • Health Promotion / organization & administration
  • Humans
  • Leadership*
  • South Africa