Comparison of two molecular methods used for subtyping of Legionella pneumophila 1 strains isolated from a hospital water supply

Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(3):683-8. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.434.

Abstract

The results of the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and the sequence-based typing (using the loci flaA, pilE, asd, mip, mompS and proA) were compared for subtyping of Legionella pneumophila 1 strains isolated from a hospital water supply. Molecular typing was carried out on 61 isolates (38% of the positive samples) selected on space and temporal criteria in order to follow the evolution of the water-system colonization. For all the 61 isolates, the sequence of the amplified mip gene fragment identified Legionella pneumophila strain Wadsworth. Genotype testing by PFGE analysis showed three different patterns, correspondent to three SBT types according to the allelic profiles. Both PFGE and SBT indicated the circulation and the persistence in the hospital potable water-system of three types randomly distributed in space and time. The two molecular methods adopted showed a 100% concordance, although a low degree of genetic heterogeneity characterized the isolates. The electrophoretic patterns were sufficiently unambiguous to consider PFGE a highly discriminatory typing method, but the SBT technique besides accurately characterizing isolates, was able to identify Legionella strains through analysis of the mip gene. A typing method with this level of discriminatory power has great potential for assisting in epidemiological studies.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bacterial Typing Techniques / methods*
  • Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
  • Hospitals
  • Legionella pneumophila / classification
  • Legionella pneumophila / genetics
  • Legionella pneumophila / isolation & purification*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Water Microbiology*
  • Water Supply / analysis*