Functional residual capacity breath hold for subtraction image of dynamic liver MRI

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jul 15.

Abstract

Purpose: In dynamic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, there are problems with misregistration when subtraction images are processed. For reduction of the misregistration, a functional residual capacity (FRC) phase breath-hold (FRC B-H) method was used.

Material and methods: Sixty patients (32 males and 28 females, aged 33-85 years, median age 69 years) were examined. The subjects were chronologically categorized into two groups: a voluntary expiratory (VE) B-H group and a FRC B-H group. The blood-flow phase images were classified as plain, arterial, portal and parenchymal phases. To evaluate the reproducibility of liver positions between VE B-H and FRC B-H in each phase (between Plain and Arterial, Arterial and Portal, Plain and Parenchymal), the misregistration areas were compared on the top of the liver.

Results: The misregistration area between Plain-Arterial, Arterial-Portal and Plain-Parenchymal in VE B-H was 731.0+/-1153.6, 1134.9+/-1357.2 and 628.4+/-844.5 (cm(2)), respectively. The misregistration area between each phase in FRC B-H was 386.4+/-874.9, 574.5+/-1086.1 and 279.8+/-551.2 (cm(2)), respectively. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test as quantitative analysis, the difference in misregistration areas between two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Differences in the qualitative analysis were also significant according to the chi(2) test (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The liver positions with FRC B-H were markedly more reproducible than those with VE B-H. To improve the registration accuracy of subtraction dynamic liver MRI, the FRC B-H should be used.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Artifacts*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Liver / pathology*
  • Liver Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Respiratory Mechanics*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Subtraction Technique*