[HIV testing after needlestick injury: must the index patient be informed?]

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Jul;133(28-29):1517-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1081101.
[Article in German]

Abstract

As a current case of needlestick injury (NSI) has demonstrated, it is obvious that in clinical practice there is often uncertainty about the procedure if the index patient refuses a blood test or is not able to give his/her consent. The question about the legality of implementing HBV, HCV and HIV testing after NSI is commented on from different points of view: occupational medicine, infection control, virology and the legal system. The testing of the index patient - without his/her consent - seems to be appropriate. The protection of health care workers should be given priority over the right of the index patient "not wanting to know" about his/her infection status.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • Legal Case

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / blood
  • HIV Infections / diagnosis*
  • HIV Infections / transmission
  • Hepatitis B / blood
  • Hepatitis B / diagnosis*
  • Hepatitis B / transmission
  • Hepatitis C / blood
  • Hepatitis C / diagnosis*
  • Hepatitis C / transmission
  • Humans
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Informed Consent / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Informed Consent / psychology
  • Male
  • Needlestick Injuries / complications*
  • Needlestick Injuries / psychology