CT-guided brachytherapy (CTGB) versus interstitial laser ablation (ILT) of colorectal liver metastases: an intraindividual matched-pair analysis

Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Jun;184(6):302-6. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1815-5.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare local tumor control after percutaneous tumor ablation by interstitial laser therapy (ILT) or CT-guided brachytherapy (CTGB).

Patients and methods: In a matched pair analysis including 18 patients with 36 liver metastases of colorectal primary, both ILT and CTGB were performed in different lesions. The following matching factors were considered: (i) tumor size < or = 5 cm, and (ii) execution of chemotherapy after tumor ablation. Primary endpoint was local tumor control.

Results: Treated lesions were identical in terms of tumor size and all matching criteria were fulfilled in all patients except for the performance of adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 14 months (3-24 months) for both groups. Only five of 18 patients (28%) demonstrated local tumor progression after CTGB, whereas in ten of 18 patients (56%) tumor progression was found after ILT. Differences encountered were significant for all patients (p = 0.04), whereas in those who fulfilled all matching criteria (n = 14) the level of statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.23).

Conclusion: CTGB demonstrated superior local tumor control compared to ILT in long-term follow-up.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Brachytherapy / methods*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Laser Therapy / methods*
  • Liver Neoplasms / radiotherapy
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Liver Neoplasms / surgery
  • Male
  • Matched-Pair Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*