Do airway metallic stents for benign lesions confer too costly a benefit?

BMC Pulm Med. 2008 Apr 18:8:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-8-7.

Abstract

Background: The use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMAS) in the treatment benign airway obstruction is controversial.

Methods: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SEMAS for this indication, we conducted a 10-year retrospective review at our tertiary medical centre.

Results: Using flexible bronchoscopy, 82 SEMAS (67% Ultraflex, 33% Wallstent) were placed in 35 patients with inoperable lesions, many with significant medical comorbidities (88%). 68% of stents were tracheal, and 83% of patients showed immediate symptomatic improvement. Reversible complications developed in 9% of patients within 24 hrs of stent placement. Late complications (>24 hrs) occurred in 77% of patients, of which 37% were clinically significant or required an interventional procedure. These were mainly due to stent migration (12.2%), fracture (19.5%), or obstructive granulomas (24.4%). The overall granuloma rate of 57% was higher at tracheal sites (59%) than bronchial ones (34%), but not significantly different between Ultraflex and Wallstents. Nevertheless, Wallstents were associated with higher rates of bleeding (5% vs. 30%, p = 0.005) and migration (7% vs. 26%, p = 0.026). Of 10 SEMAS removed using flexible bronchoscopy, only one was associated with incomplete removal of fractured stent wire. Median survival was 3.6 +/- 2.7 years.

Conclusion: Ill patients with inoperable lesions may be considered for treatment with SEMAS.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Airway Obstruction / therapy*
  • Bronchial Diseases / therapy*
  • Bronchoscopy
  • Female
  • Foreign-Body Migration / etiology
  • Granuloma / therapy*
  • Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Stents / adverse effects*
  • Tracheal Diseases / therapy*