A comparison of results obtained using liquid injection and headspace solid-phase microextraction for crude oil analysis by GC with mass spectrometer detection

J Chromatogr Sci. 2008 Apr;46(4):332-8. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/46.4.332.

Abstract

Gas chromatographic (GC) analysis in solution and head space solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-GC analysis of a sample of crude oil gave different results. The SPME technique allowed the identification of a larger number of components than by using usual GC-mass spectrometry (MS). The method failed within the range of C14-C25 where GC-MS in solution allowed to obtain more representative results; on the contrary, SPME allowed to obtain data on the presence of volatile compounds that can not be identified in GC-MS analysis in solution. Furthermore, in the range C8-C12, SPME allowed to identify approximately 30 compounds not shown in the GC-MS analysis in solution. SPME analysis showed the presence of some alkenes not identified in GC-MS analysis in solution. SPME-GC-MS can be used in the analysis of crude oil in contaminated soil.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry / methods*
  • Petroleum / analysis*
  • Solid Phase Microextraction / methods*

Substances

  • Petroleum