Computing hospitalization rates in presence of repeated events: impact and countermeasures to avoid misinterpretation

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Apr;14(2):316-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00861.x.

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives: The admission rate, including both first and recurrent events, is a clear overall measure of hospital utilization, its variability accounting for individual propensity to disease recurrence.

Method: In this paper, we compared two variance estimators derived from the Poisson and negative binomial distribution of directly and indirectly age/gender-standardized hospitalization rates allowing for multiple events. The latter approach accommodates departures from the assumption of randomness of repeated events required by the Poisson distribution. We apply these methods to a retrospective cohort based on hospital discharge data in 2001 of Piedmont (north-western Italy) residents.

Results: Estimated standard errors under the negative binomial for both directly and indirectly standardized rates result in almost twice those under the Poisson distribution.

Conclusion: Our analysis confirms that ignoring the typical non-random nature of repeated events underestimates the true variance of rates and can lead to biased optimistic interpretation of study results.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bias*
  • Binomial Distribution
  • Cohort Studies
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Poisson Distribution
  • Recurrence*
  • Retrospective Studies