Background: Recent, conflicting results about the use of tissue Doppler imaging derived (TDI-) asynchrony indices to predict reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) have raised questions about their physiological meaning and methodological limitations.
Methods: In 41 patients, baseline TDI-derived septal to lateral delays of peak velocities (TDI-SL), standard deviation of peak velocities over 12 segments (Ts-SD), and peak 2D longitudinal strain (strain-SL) were compared with volumetric response (reduction in end-systolic volume of > or =15%) after at least 6 months of CRT. Timing of peak TDI velocities was compared to timing of 2DS velocities and strain-SL. Influence of sample position, transverse motion, and interobserver inconsistency of the chosen peak velocities was assessed. Diagnostic accuracy of TDI-based delays was compared to accuracy of visual and 2D strain-based assessment.
Results: After 7.0+/-3.2 months of CRT, 24 patients were classified as responders. TDI-SL and Ts-SD were similar between responders and nonresponders at baseline, did not predict response, and were unaffected by CRT. Visual asynchrony scoring and strain-SL were better predictors of response than TDI-SL and Ts-SD. TDI measurements were highly susceptible to sample location and transverse motion components and poorly correlated with the timing of longitudinal contraction. There was a considerably poor agreement between observers with regard to scoring of TDI-SL and Ts-SD.
Conclusion: TDI-based measurements of asynchrony do not appear robust predictors of volume response to CRT.