Comparison of the bacteriological quality of tap water and bottled mineral water

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2008 Oct;211(5-6):504-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.09.004. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

Abstract

The bacteriological quality of tap water from municipal water supplies, 20-L bottles of mineral water from water dispensers and samples collected from new 20-L bottles of mineral water were comparatively studied. Total coliforms, termotolerant coliforms, Escherichia coli, fecal streptococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus spp. and heterotrophic plate count were enumerated. The results showed that 36.4% of the tap water samples from municipal water systems and 76.6% of the 20-L bottles of mineral water from water dispensers were contaminated by at least one coliform or indicator bacterium and/or at least one pathogenic bacterium. The bacteriological quality of municipal tap water is superior when compared with the 20-L bottles of mineral water collected from water dispensers and samples collected from new 20-L bottles of mineral water before installation in the dispensers. This highlights the need for an improved surveillance system for the bottled water industry. For the municipal water systems, it is recommended to perform the Pseudomonas enumeration periodically, in addition to the routine data collected by most systems.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Brazil
  • Carbonated Beverages / microbiology*
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Enterobacteriaceae / isolation & purification*
  • Enterococcus / isolation & purification
  • Escherichia coli / isolation & purification
  • Food Industry
  • Humans
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa / isolation & purification
  • Staphylococcus / isolation & purification
  • Water Microbiology*
  • Water Supply*