Forward surgery

J R Army Med Corps. 2007 Sep;153(3):149-51. doi: 10.1136/jramc-153-03-01.

Abstract

Deployment of Forward Surgery is a balance of risk and benefit. The resources will clearly be less than at a more major facility and so care may be compromised. Equally the tactical situation may be non-permissive and limb and life saving intervention required before the movement is possible. However, in order to provide satisfactory care at a forward location sufficient resources to deliver the full requirements of DCR & DCS must be met, which would limit manoeuvrability. This would include large volumes of blood and blood products, critical care and experienced personnel. The later will need to be some of the most senior medical staff as the decision to not operate, if intervention is unnecessary as the patient could wait or intervention would be futile, is one that requires experience. The deployment of these personnel would need to be balanced with the depletion of the experience from the major facility. Forward surgery may be appropriate in the build up phase, establishing a first surgical foot print to develop into a more capable facility (26) or wind down as the major facility is dismantled to be relocated at an alternative location. Ultimately the deployment of forward surgery hinges on the tactical assessment and the ability to evacuate casualties in a timely fashion to the best equipped and resourced facility possible. This decision must be informed by the limitations this may impose on the management of the majority casualties who do not require forward surgery. Forward surgery should only be deployed as part of an overall trauma system with continuous assessment of outcomes. The goal remains "the right patient, right place at the right time".

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Military Medicine*
  • Military Personnel*
  • Patient Transfer*
  • Resuscitation
  • Time Factors
  • Triage*
  • United Kingdom
  • Warfare*
  • Wounds and Injuries / surgery*