Objective versus subjective assessment of methylphenidate response

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2008 Sep;39(3):273-82. doi: 10.1007/s10578-007-0087-0. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

Abstract

Subjective improvement-assessment in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), following a single dose of methylphenidate (MPH) was compared to performance on the Test-of-Variables-of-Attention (TOVA). Self-perception was assessed with the clinical-global-impression-of-change (CGI-C). Participants included 165 ADHD subjects (M:F ratio 67%:33%) aged 5-18 (11.09 +/- 3.43) years. TOVA was administered before and after MPH challenge (0.3 mg/kg). Self-perception CGI-C scores were compared to the TOVA scores. An inverse correlation was found only between CGI-C and the TOVA-Commission-scores (r = -0.326, p < 0.001). We thus conclude that subjective reports are too unreliable to be used in order to assess MPH benefit in ADHD pediatric populations.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / diagnosis
  • Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / drug therapy*
  • Central Nervous System Stimulants / therapeutic use*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methylphenidate / therapeutic use*
  • Self Concept
  • Severity of Illness Index

Substances

  • Central Nervous System Stimulants
  • Methylphenidate