The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of lightwand-guided endotracheal intubation (LWEI) performed using either the right (dominant) or left (nondominant) hand. Two hundred and forty patients aged 21-64 years, with a Mallampati airway classification grade of I-II and undergoing endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia, were enrolled in this randomized and controlled study. Induction of anesthesia was initiated by intravenous administration of fentanyl (2 microg/kg) and thiopentone (5 mg/kg), and tracheal intubation was facilitated by intravenous atracurium (0.5 mg/kg). In the direct-vision laryngoscope group (group D; n = 80), the intubator held the laryngoscope in the left hand and inserted the endotracheal tube (ETT) into the glottic opening with the right hand. In the group in which LWEI was performed with the right hand (group R; n = 80), the intubator lifted the patients' jaws with the left hand and inserted the ETT-LW unit into the glottic openings with the right hand. On the contrary, in the group in which LWEI was performed with the left hand (group L; n = 80), the intubator lifted the jaws with the right hand and inserted the ETT-LW unit with the left hand. Data including total intubation time, the number of intubation attempts, hemodynamic changes during intubation, and side effects following intubation, were collected. Regardless of whether lightwand manipulation was performed with the left hand (group L; 11.4 +/- 9.3 s) or the right-hand (group R; 12.4 +/- 9.2 s), less time was consumed in the LWEI groups than in the laryngoscope group (group D; 17.9 +/- 9.9 s) (p < 0.001). All three groups obtained success rates greater than 95% on their first intubation attempts. The changes in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were similar among the three groups. A higher incidence of intubation-related oral injury and ventricular premature contractions (VPC) was found in group D compared with groups L and R (oral injury: group D 8.5%, group L 1.3%, group R 0%, p = 0.005; VPC: group D 16.3%, group L 5%, group R 7.5%, p = 0.04). We concluded that LWEI performed by either dominant or nondominant hands resulted in similar efficiency, and could be a suitable alternative to traditional laryngoscopy. It is both feasible and logical for an experienced anesthesiologist to use the nondominant hand to perform LWEI.