Background. The objective of this paper is efficacy assesment of partial bone resection procedure with subsequent joint exchange as a method of skeletal cancer metastases and pathological fractures surgical treatment within hip and shoulder among patients in our own experience.<br /> Material and methods. 79 patients operated between 1997 and 2002 were assesed.Group I - 68 cases with sceletal cancer metastases and pathological fracture of proximal femur.Group II - 11 patients with sceletal cancer metastases and pathological fracture of humerus.The patients underwent primary or secondary (after complications) partial resection procedure with subsequent joint prosthesis implantation.The range of femur resection was 6-17cm.Various types of total or partial hip and shoulder joint endoprostheses according to indication were used.Additional paliative radiotherapy of mathastases,bisphosphonians and analgetics were used according to the case.The average follow-up period was 9,6 months (0-3y). The efficacy analysis was based on Enneking limb function test and Merle d'Aubigne classification and X-ray analysis in patients with partial proximal femur resection.<br /> Results. Group I-according to Enneking test in 41 patients very good and good results,fair in 22 and bad only in 5 cases were found.According to Merle'd Aubigne classification in 37 cases very good and good outcome was found.In 25 the outcome was fair and bad in 6 patients.The machanical instability complication assesed radiologically were found in 7 patients.<br /> Conclusions. The partial bone resection with subsequent joint exchange procedure is positively assesed in patients subjective opinion and its high rate of very good and good results let us conclude this kind of surgery as a very good method in some types of pathological fracture treatment.However a massive bone and particullary soft tissue resection may produce higher incidence of mechanical complications - especially dislocations.