Clinical effectiveness of treatments for anorexia nervosa in adolescents: randomised controlled trial

Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov:191:427-35. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.036764.

Abstract

Background: Treatment guidelines identify few adequately powered trials to guide recommendations for anorexia nervosa.

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of three readily available National Health Service treatments for adolescents (aged 12-18 years) with anorexia nervosa.

Method: Multicentre randomised controlled trial of 167 young people comparing in-patient, specialist out-patient and general child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) treatment.

Results: Each group made considerable progress at 1 year, with further improvement by 2 years. Full recovery rates were poor (33% at 2 years, 27% still with anorexia nervosa). Adherence to in-patient treatment was only 50%. Neither in-patient nor specialist out-patient therapy demonstrated advantages over general CAMHS treatment by intention to treat, although some CAMHS out-patients were subsequently admitted on clinical grounds. In-patient treatment (randomised or after out-patient transfer) predicted poor outcomes.

Conclusions: First-line in-patient psychiatric treatment does not provide advantages over out-patient management. Out-patient treatment failures do very poorly on transfer to in-patient facilities.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Anorexia Nervosa / therapy*
  • Child
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / methods
  • Community Mental Health Services / methods
  • Delivery of Health Care / methods*
  • England
  • Family Therapy / methods
  • Female
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
  • Patient Compliance
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • State Medicine / organization & administration
  • Treatment Outcome

Associated data

  • ISRCTN/ISRCTN39345394