[The cost effectiveness of hemorrhage units]

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1991 Dec;80(6):394-8.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Gastrointestinal bleeding units appear as an alternative to intensive care units in the management of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Their hospitalization advantages and economic impact, however, are poorly evaluated. A survey was done among 176 Spanish general hospitals over 100 beds. Forty-four percent of the 176 hospitals answering the questionnaire had a protocol for the management of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Results from our survey show that gastrointestinal bleeding units are regarded as either useful (53%) or necessary (41%) by most hospitals, and should be equipped to provide intermediate-type care (88%). To the vast majority of hospitals, patient care is paramount to evaluate the yield of gastrointestinal bleeding units; in contrast, cost-efficiency analysis is relevant to only 31%, whereas the combination of cost efficiency and research is relevant to 61% of hospitals. Mean hospital charges for patients in our gastrointestinal bleeding unit, which has an occupancy rate of 95%, are 53% higher than those for regular inpatients, and 64% lower than those for patients in the intensive care unit.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / statistics & numerical data
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / economics*
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / therapy
  • Hospital Units / economics*
  • Hospital Units / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitals, General / economics
  • Hospitals, General / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Spain
  • Surveys and Questionnaires