Transvaginal vs transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Mar;19(3):357-60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0440-7. Epub 2007 Aug 29.

Abstract

We present comparative short-term experience with the transvaginal (TVT) and the transobturator (TVT-O) approaches for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We studied 315 women with SUI, treated with a tension-free tape placement. The TVT approach was applied in 265 women, while 50 women were treated by the TVT-O approach. The mean operation time was 25 and 17 min in the TVT and TVT-O group, respectively (p<0.001). In the TVT group, continence rates were 87% after 1 year, while in the TVT-O group, the continence rate was 94%. Postoperative pain was reported in 14.4 and 28% of the TVT and TVT-O patients, respectively (p=0.02). Complications such as bladder perforation, retropubic hematoma, and urinary retention took place only in the TVT group. Urinary tract infections were recorded in 20 and 8% of the TVT and TVT-O patients, respectively (p=0.04), while vaginal erosion took place in 1.5 and 2% and de novo urgency in 14 and 8%. Both approaches show high rates of cure at the first postoperative year, while complications are less with the TVT-O procedure.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Polypropylenes*
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Suburethral Slings*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / physiopathology
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / surgery*
  • Urodynamics / physiology
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / methods*

Substances

  • Polypropylenes