Impact of case management on rural women's quality of life and substance use

Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;7(3):710. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

Abstract

Introduction: It is widely accepted that women experience drug dependency in different ways from men, including a greater sense of social stigma, higher levels of shame and self-blame, and higher rates of psychological co-morbidity. There is also evidence that women's experience of substance dependency may be negatively affected by living in a rural area. Recognising the complex needs of rural drug dependent women, a community-based case management model (known as WRAP--women's referral and access program) was developed, which adopted a holistic approach and aimed to address the physical, social and psychological dimensions of women's lives. This article reports a study to determine if this model was effective in meeting the women's broader support needs; and specifically whether it improved women's quality of life, health and social circumstances.

Methods: Women were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months, using a semi-structured interview, the WHO Quality of Life brief version (WHOQoL-BREF), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Brief Treatment Outcome Measure (BTOM).

Results: Sixty-three women were recruited to case management. After 6 months, 62% of women recruited remained in case management, with older women and those with better self-reported health status at recruitment more likely to do so. Consistent with women's subjective experience, there were significant improvements in self-esteem; the psychological domain of the WHOQoL-BREF; severity of dependence, psychological wellbeing and social functioning (BTOM); with reductions in drug dependency and drug use. The model, linking women with services and some direct service provision, was generally well accepted by women.

Conclusion: The WRAP case management model, with its holistic approach and focus on improving women's quality of life rather than on reducing drug use per se and/or trying to move women into drug treatment, was successful. The model is well suited to implementation within the constraints of a rural setting. There is strong evidence for improvement in many areas of women's lives over a 6 month period of case management, and a trend towards continued improvement beyond 3 months of case management in some areas. For women, the success of case management was a result of the consistency and continuity provided by having one person who provided much needed support and assistance.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Alcohol Drinking / epidemiology
  • Case Management* / statistics & numerical data
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Marijuana Abuse / epidemiology
  • Middle Aged
  • New South Wales / epidemiology
  • Opioid-Related Disorders / epidemiology
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Satisfaction / statistics & numerical data
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications / epidemiology
  • Pregnancy Complications / therapy
  • Qualitative Research
  • Quality of Life*
  • Rural Health Services* / statistics & numerical data
  • Self Concept
  • Smoking / epidemiology
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Substance Abuse, Intravenous / epidemiology
  • Substance-Related Disorders / epidemiology
  • Substance-Related Disorders / therapy*