Background: The clinical significance of inferior wall acute myocardial infarction (MI) with combined ST-segment elevation in both anterior and inferior leads, compared with inferior leads alone, is unknown.
Hypothesis: Despite having more leads with precordial ST-segment elevation, these patients may have a better outcome due to less posterior involvement, which tends to drag down the precordial ST-segment.
Methods: A total of 158 postinferior MI patients with documented proximal right coronary artery occlusion were retrospectively studied. They were divided into three subgroups according to the magnitude of concurrent ST-segment deviation in lead V2: Group A (n = 19) had ST-segment elevation >/= 2.0 mm; Group B (n = 74) had ST-segment lay between + 2.0 mm and - 2.0 mm; and Group C (n = 65) had ST-segment depression >/= 2.0 mm. The clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics were then compared among these threes subgroups.
Results: The baseline demography, prevalence of risk factors, and treatment received were of no difference among the subgroups. However, Group A patients had significantly lower peak creatinine phosphokinase level and more preserved left ventricular function than Group B and C. Moreover, they had lower total sum of inferior ST-segment magnitude, less ST-segment depression in V4-6, and more ST-segment elevation in V(4R) than Group C. Group C patients had highest in-hospital and one-year mortality although it did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions: Precordial ST-segment elevation in inferior wall acute MI was associated with smaller infarct size and better left ventricular function, probably secondary to occlusion of a less dominant RCA, which did not result in a significant posterior infarction.