Computational gene prediction and identifying alternatively spliced isoforms have always been a challenging task. In this paper, we describe the performance of three gene/exon finding programmes namely Fex, Gen view2 and Gene builder capable of predicting open reading frames or exons for a given set of sequences from C. elegans genome. The predicted exons were compared with the 'sequencing consortium' identified exons and degree of consensus among them is discussed. We found that exon prediction by Fex was similar to the consortium prediction as compared to Gen view2 and Gene builder results. Interestingly, some exons (six exons in five genes) predicted positive only by Fex and not by the 'sequencing consortium' are found at the C. elegans EST database. This data is critical for further debate and discussion on gene finding in C. elegans.