External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application

Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(14):1731-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm211. Epub 2007 Jun 14.

Abstract

Aims: External cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) may damage implanted pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ECV comparing mono- to biphasic shock waveforms in patients with implanted rhythm devices.

Methods and results: Patients with pacemaker or ICD systems and an indication for ECV were randomized to receive mono- or biphasic shocks. Systems were tested immediately before and after ECV, 1 h and 1 week later with respect to device and lead integrity. Forty-four patients (71 +/- 10 years, 31 male; 29 pacemakers, 12 ICDs, three cardiac resynchronization systems) underwent ECV with antero-posterior paddle orientation (monophasic in 21 and biphasic in 23 patients). Pacing impedances were reduced immediately after ECV (atrial 402-392 ohm, P < 0.001; ventricular 517-496 ohm, P = 0.001) and returned to baseline values within 1 week. Ventricular sensing was reduced immediately after ECV (12.4-11.6 mV, P = 0.004). There was no device or lead dysfunction in any patient. ECV was successful in 42/44 patients (95%), cumulative energy was significantly lower for biphasic compared with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: ECV for AF seems to be safe and effective in patients with implanted rhythm devices.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Atrial Fibrillation / therapy*
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Electric Countershock / adverse effects
  • Electric Countershock / methods*
  • Electrocardiography / methods*
  • Equipment Failure Analysis / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Treatment Outcome