Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, chlorproguanil-dapsone, or chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Afghanistan and Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial

JAMA. 2007 May 23;297(20):2201-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.20.2201.

Abstract

Context: In areas where Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax coexist and treatments for the 2 species differ, misdiagnosis can lead to poor outcomes in either disease. A unified therapy effective against both species would reduce reliance on species-specific diagnosis, which in many areas is difficult to maintain. The antifolates are an important and affordable antimalarial class to which it is often assumed P vivax malaria is intrinsically resistant.

Objective: To test the relative efficacy and safety of 2 antifolate drugs against P vivax malaria and compare each with chloroquine.

Design, setting, and patients: An open-label randomized controlled trial comparing chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and chlorproguanil-dapsone for the treatment of P vivax malaria was conducted in eastern Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan, areas in which P vivax malaria predominates. A total of 20,410 patients older than 3 years were screened; 767 patients (315 in Pakistan and 452 in Afghanistan) with confirmed P vivax malaria were enrolled and followed up daily for 4 days, then weekly for 28 days, between March 2004 and June 2006.

Main outcome measures: Complete clearance of parasites with no recrudescence by day 14. Secondary outcomes included being parasite-free by day 28, clinical failure, and anemia.

Results: By day 14, only 1 patient in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group had parasites. By day 28, failure rates were found in 2 of 153 patients (1.3%) in the chloroquine group, 5 of 290 patients (1.7%) in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine group, and 27 of 272 patients (9.9%) in the chlorproguanil-dapsone group. Chlorproguanil-dapsone was less effective than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-17.0; P<.001) and chloroquine (adjusted OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.0-36.5; P = .004). Chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine were equivalent in efficacy at day 28 (adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.3-7.0; P = .73). Chloroquine cleared gametocytes and asexual parasites more rapidly than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or chlorproguanil-dapsone did. All drugs were well tolerated.

Conclusions: Although chloroquine remains the drug of choice, antifolates are effective against P vivax malaria in South Asia. These drugs may be appropriate for unified treatment where species-specific diagnosis is unavailable, most likely in combination with other drugs.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00158561.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Afghanistan
  • Aged
  • Antimalarials / therapeutic use*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Chloroquine / therapeutic use
  • Dapsone / therapeutic use
  • Drug Combinations
  • Drug Resistance
  • Female
  • Folic Acid Antagonists / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Malaria, Vivax / drug therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pakistan
  • Proguanil / analogs & derivatives
  • Proguanil / therapeutic use
  • Pyrimethamine / therapeutic use
  • Sulfadoxine / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antimalarials
  • Drug Combinations
  • Folic Acid Antagonists
  • chloroguanil, dapsone drug combination
  • fanasil, pyrimethamine drug combination
  • Sulfadoxine
  • Chloroquine
  • chlorproguanil
  • Dapsone
  • Proguanil
  • Pyrimethamine

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00158561