[Behavior of the chemiluminescent ELISA method in relation to results considered discordant via three conventional techniques for diagnosing Chagas disease]

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007 Jan-Feb;40(1):68-70. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822007000100014.
[Article in Portuguese]

Abstract

When indirect hemagglutination, indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay are used together for serologically diagnosing Chagas disease, results that are considered discordant sometimes occur because there is disagreement between what these tests indicate. The availability of the chemiluminescent ELISA method enabled tests on 200 serum samples that had previously produced discordant results from the three above-mentioned methods. CL-ELISA revealed that 193 of these samples were negative and seven were positive. The use of this new procedure provides further support for understanding this subject, but more concrete advances will depend on documentation with blood analyses from people previously demonstrated to be unquestionably infected or uninfected with Trypanosoma cruzi.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Protozoan / blood*
  • Antigens, Protozoan*
  • Chagas Disease / diagnosis*
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect
  • Hemagglutination Tests
  • Humans
  • Luminescent Measurements / methods*
  • Trypanosoma cruzi / immunology*

Substances

  • Antibodies, Protozoan
  • Antigens, Protozoan