Comparative assessment of the association information captured by SNP tagging

Abstract

Exploiting the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) can potentially reduce the costs of association mapping of common disease genes. Different methods have been proposed for defining subsets of SNPs as proxies (or tagSNPs) for other SNPs, some of which rely upon a model of haplotype blocks. Other approaches only consider the pair-wise correlation between markers as a basis for selecting tagSNPs. Yet another, recently proposed model-based method takes marker heterozygosity and genetic distance into account in order to maximize the expected utility of a marker set to map frequent, but unobserved genetic variants. We compared these tagging approaches with regard to their ability to correlate tagSNPs and bi-allelic, potentially disease-causing genetic variants. We used the CEU sample of chromosome 19 from the HapMap project for an initial comparison, and demonstrated a comparable performance of both approaches but a difference in terms of tagSNPs selected and variants captured. In any case, we conclude that a considerable loss of information appears to be inherent to any type of SNP tagging, even when dense marker sets are available for SNP selection.