A comparison of the performance of two chromatographic and three extraction techniques for the analysis of PAHS in sources of drinking water

J Chromatogr Sci. 2007 Feb;45(2):57-62. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/45.2.57.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to establish a sensitive and reliable method for the analysis of the 16 priority Environmental Protection Agency-defined polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in water samples. Gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry (MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection (FLD)-UV techniques are optimized to obtain an adequate resolution of all compounds. Validation of the methods is carried out, and a good performance is observed for both techniques. The HPLC-FLD-UV technique is somewhat more sensitive than the GC-MS technique for the determination of PAHs; thus, the HPLC-FLD-UV method is used to follow up both the solid-phase extraction (SPE) analysis using cartridges and discs and the liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), which are also evaluated for the extraction of the PAHs. Low recoveries between 43% and 79% are obtained using SPE cartridges, and higher values are obtained using SPE discs (56-96%) and LLE (60-105%). Better results are obtained using the LLE technique, and, thus, analysis of real water samples is carried out using this technique. LODs between 0.6 and 21 ng/L and relative standard deviations less than 15% are obtained using a spiked water sample analyzed using the full LLE HPLC-FLD-UV method.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / methods*
  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry / methods*
  • Polycyclic Compounds / analysis*
  • Polycyclic Compounds / isolation & purification
  • Reference Standards
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet / methods*
  • Water Supply / analysis*

Substances

  • Polycyclic Compounds