Peg-filgrastim versus filgrastim after autologous stem cell tranplantation: case-control study in patients with multiple myeloma and review of the literature

Leuk Res. 2007 Nov;31(11):1487-93. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

Abstract

We investigated the effects of a single s.c. injection of peg-filgrastim in 32 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (AuSCT) as first line treatment. For comparison, 32 myeloma patients with similar characteristics and receiving standard daily administration of filgrastim were matched. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences between peg-filgrastim and filgrastim in terms of tolerability, marrow recovery, severity of neutropenia, incidence and duration of febrile neutropenia, documented infections and transfusions. However, some favourable trends or effects in favour of peg-filgrastim were observed. This was confirmed by a review of the published papers about this topic.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Case-Control Studies
  • Filgrastim
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / adverse effects
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Multiple Myeloma / drug therapy
  • Multiple Myeloma / surgery*
  • Polyethylene Glycols / adverse effects
  • Polyethylene Glycols / therapeutic use*
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Stem Cell Transplantation*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Recombinant Proteins
  • pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, human
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Filgrastim