Objective: There is conflicting evidence with regard to the impact of preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) on the post mitral valve (MV) repair on the early and late outcome.
Methods: A total of 349 patients undergoing various MV repair procedures for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) between 1997 and 2003 were studied. Preoperatively, 152 (44%) of these patients were in AF and 197 (56%) patients were in sinus rhythm (SR). The clinical features and the outcome in these two cohorts of patients were compared.
Results: The patients in the AF group were older than their counterparts in the SR group (66+/-7 vs 62+/-9 years) (p=0.01), had a higher mean NYHA class score (2.4+/-0.6 vs 2.2+/-0.7) (p=0.04) and were more likely to have impaired left ventricular function (60% vs 36%) (p<0.0001). A similar proportion of patients in the AF (38%) and SR (30%) groups had additional cardiac surgical procedures (p=0.12). Operative mortality was 3.9% in AF group versus 0.5% in SR group (p=0.04), and operative morbidity was 27% versus 17%, respectively (p=0.03). At latest follow up, 4% of patients that were in SR preoperatively developed AF; conversely, 2% of the patients in the AF group converted to SR. The rates of recurrent grade II or III MR (4% vs 5%) (p=0.8) and MV re-operation (2.6% vs 2.5%) (p=1.0) were similar in the AF and SR groups. Kaplan-Meier survival at 7 years was 75+/-6% versus 90+/-3% (p=0.005). On Cox proportional hazards regression model, impaired LV function [(p=0.02), hazard ratio 0.25 (95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 0.078-0.84)] and AF [(p=0.03), hazard ratio 2.70 (95% C.I. 1.09-6.68)] were significant adverse predictors of survival.
Conclusions: This study shows that in patients undergoing MV repair for degenerative MR, preoperative AF has a major negative impact on the early and late survival.