Do the neural correlates of acupuncture and placebo effects differ?

Pain. 2007 Mar;128(1-2):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Jan 30.

Abstract

The neurophysiological basis of therapeutic acupuncture is not well understood but is likely to consist of both specific and non-specific (e.g. placebo) effects. Data from animal studies suggest that endogenous anti-nociceptive networks may play a large role in therapeutic acupuncture. These networks have also been demonstrated to support placebo analgesia making differentiation between acupuncture specific and non-specific networks challenging. However, modern neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) provide a means to safely monitor brain activity in humans and may be used to help map the neural correlates of acupuncture. Recent neuroimaging studies have explored brain activity during acupuncture stimulation and/or the analgesic effects of acupuncture on pain stimulus processing. Although controversy regarding appropriate control methodology (e.g. sham acupuncture) continues, data suggest that modulation of certain limbic brain networks may differentiate between specific and placebo components of acupuncture.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Acupuncture Therapy / methods*
  • Brain / physiopathology*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Evidence-Based Medicine*
  • Humans
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Pain / diagnosis
  • Pain / physiopathology*
  • Pain Management*
  • Placebo Effect
  • Spinal Cord / physiopathology*
  • Treatment Outcome