Using red-free monochromatic conversions of nonmydriatic digital fundus images

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;143(2):371-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.039. Epub 2006 Oct 17.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare three types of digital images for assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects: red-free RNFL images, color nonmydriatic images, and digitally converted nonmydriatic red-free fundus images.

Design: Diagnostic test comparison.

Methods: Ninety-five image sets of three type images were evaluated. Converted images were acquired from nonmydriatic digital images by converting them into red-free, monochromatic images with graphics software. Taking RNFL images as standards, the sensitivities/specificities of nonmydriatic digital color and converted images were evaluated for detecting wedge-shaped defect (WSD) or diffuse atrophy.

Results: In terms of WSD, the sensitivity/specificity of converted images were 85.7%/95.5%, and those of nonmydriatic were 83.9%/91.0%. Regarding diffuse atrophy, the sensitivity/specificity of converted images were 60.0%/97.8%, and those of nonmydriatic were 60.0%/98.9%. Intragrader/intergrader agreements for converted images were 0.849/0.793 (WSD) and 0.417/0.614 (diffuse atrophy).

Conclusions: Converted nonmydriatic fundus images without pupillary dilation are as effective as conventional red-free RNFL images for detecting WSD.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Atrophy
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological*
  • Fundus Oculi
  • Glaucoma / diagnosis*
  • Humans
  • Nerve Fibers / pathology*
  • Optic Disk / pathology*
  • Optic Nerve Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Photography / instrumentation*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retinal Ganglion Cells / pathology*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity