Patient satisfaction after closed reduction of nasal fractures

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):40-3. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.9.1.40.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of closed reduction from a patient's point of view, because there is increasing evidence that closed reduction of nasal fractures fails to address deformities of the cartilaginous nasal framework and the septum.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 62 patients who underwent a closed reduction of nasal fracture between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2005. All patients were interviewed regarding the esthetic and functional outcomes after closed reduction.

Results: Eighteen patients (29%) expressed dissatisfaction with the esthetic outcome of the reduction, and 18 (29%) said they would consider further surgery to correct the residual nasal deformity.

Conclusions: A stringent preoperative assessment of the nasal fracture, other nasal deformities, and nasal function is essential before offering patients a simple closed reduction of their nasal fractures. A septorhinoplasty, as the definitive procedure, should be offered to patients when a closed reduction is deemed unable to address all deformities.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Child
  • Female
  • Fracture Fixation / methods*
  • Fractures, Bone / etiology
  • Fractures, Bone / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasal Bone / injuries*
  • Nasal Bone / surgery*
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies