Use of isolated infected spores to determine the sporocidal efficacy of two commercial antifungal rinses against Microsporum canis

Vet Dermatol. 2007 Feb;18(1):55-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2007.00568.x.

Abstract

In this study, isolated infective Microsporum canis spores were used in an in vitro test model to compare the sporocidal activity of two commercial topical antifungal rinses. The two commercial test solutions used in the study were a lime sulphur solution 97.8% (LymDyp) and miconazole base 5.2%/chlorhexidine gluconate 5.9% mixture (Malaseb Concentrate Rinse). Water and household bleach were used as controls. Isolated infective spores were harvested from infected hairs and 500 microL of the spore suspension was incubated with an equal volume of dilutions of lime sulphur or the miconazole/chlorhexidine gluconate combination for 5 min and 4 h followed by fungal culture. There were too many to count colonies on the water control plates. Lime sulphur was 100% sporocidal at all test dilutions at both times. Miconazole/chlorhexidine gluconate was 100% sporocidal at all but the 1 : 128 dilution after 5 min of incubation and 100% sporocidal when incubated with spores for 4 h. It is not known if the two products have similar antifungal activity against infective spores on or within hairs; however, based on the findings of this study there is good evidence to recommend either rinse as an adjuvant topical therapy in a dermatophyte treatment and control program.

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Cutaneous
  • Animals
  • Antifungal Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antifungal Agents / pharmacology*
  • Antifungal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Baths / veterinary
  • Cat Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Cat Diseases / microbiology
  • Cats
  • Dermatomycoses / drug therapy
  • Dermatomycoses / veterinary*
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Microsporum / drug effects*
  • Spores

Substances

  • Antifungal Agents