The Family Medicine Curriculum Resource Project: implications for faculty development

Fam Med. 2007 Jan;39(1):50-2.

Abstract

Faculty development implications related to implementing the Family Medicine Curriculum Resource (FMCR) Project provide an opportunity to look at the recommendations of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine's federally funded Faculty Futures Initiative (FFI) and the recent Future of Family Medicine (FFM) project. Implications for faculty development include the importance of the clerkship setting, originally defined in 1991, with new features added in today's practice environment as outlined by the FFM and the changing assumptions in approaching faculty development. Previously, faculty development focused on teaching learners to master current knowledge. Now, faculty must teach learners how to master new competencies throughout their lives; learners need to learn how they and others learn now. Teaching must focus on how to learn in the future as well as what to learn for the present. Competence ("what individuals know or are able to do in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes") has become the focus of curriculum development efforts over the last few years and most appropriately serves as the focus of curriculum development in the FMCR Project. Implications for developing teachers and preceptors focus on the skills and circumstances required to teach and evaluate all types (cognitive, metacognitive, and affective) of competence. In the new culture, novel teaching methods will serve as the focus of faculty development in teaching and of educational ("best practices") research.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Clerkship
  • Curriculum*
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate / standards*
  • Faculty, Medical* / organization & administration
  • Family Practice / education*
  • Humans
  • Organizational Culture
  • Preceptorship
  • Program Development