Metastatic kidney cancer is still a devastating disease but it represents a very heterogeneous situation. Some patients will have a median survival limited to some months, while others will live several years. If the initial diagnosis of kidney cancer at metastatic stage is quite uncommon, it raises the question of whether or not performing initial nephrectomy. The point was long debated as it was suggested that initial nephrectomy could result in a spontaneous metastase regression and protect against local complications (hematuria, local pain,...). Today, nephrectomy must not be systematic, as effective alternative treatments are often available. Furthermore spontaneous postoperative metastasis regression is unusual. Two recent prospective randomized trials clarified the impact of initial nephrectomy. It is now accepted that initial surgery prior to systemic immunotherapy results in 30% survival benefit. However this procedure should only be considered for highly selected cases: patients in otherwise good condition (ECOG 0-1), macroscopically complete local resection, no supra-hepatic caval thrombus, and patients suitable for systemic immunotherapy treatment. Several questions remain unanswered, such as lymph node dissection to be performed, and its real survival impact. Furthermore the definition of "suitable" patients for immunotherapy has to be clarified, based on the recent results from the Percy Quatro study. It would probably be more effective to consider only patients with an expected good survival benefit using immunotherapy, such as those classified as "good prognosis" based on the CRECY criteria. Finally the development of new drugs, targeting mainly the angiogenic pathway may lead to different future indications in this setting.